add a link

Entertainment Geekly: Which movie from 1999 has aged most poorly? | PopWatch | EW.com

add comment
Fanpup says...
I remember visiting this website once...
It was called Entertainment Geekly: Which movie from 1999 has aged most poorly? | PopWatch | EW.com
Here's some stuff I remembered seeing:
Entertainment Geekly: Which movie from 1999 has aged most poorly?
It’s been 15 years since 1999, because that’s how time works. 1999 is generally considered a great year for movies. Transformative, even: A diverse array of films, directed by a fleet of up-and-coming filmmakers, all arriving at the multiplex back when cable was lame enough and the internet was slow enough to make the multiplex a place that mattered.
'Super Smash Bros.' was the best and worst thing to happen to Nintendo
If you happened to be young in 1999—or young-ish—it was possible to feel like you were seeing the entire cinematic art form evolve in front of you. Fifteen years ago this month was
, instant-cult films helmed by young/hip directors (all of whom successfully grew into middle-aged/important directors.) They followed
declared 1999 “The Year That Changed Movies.”
Movies are like wine: They age well, except when they don’t. Wild assertion: If you were to take a straw poll of the American subconsciousness, I’d be willing to bet that the 1999 movie with the most consistent uber-positive rating would be
is one of the best movies ever made about hating your job, and one of the best movies ever made about being bored–two across-the-board human experiences that movies are (historically, respectively) just-okay and utterly terrible at dramatizing. And
was uniquely designed to age well. Sure, the computers look old and the clothes are too big. But that’s in service to the film’s banal drudgery: The character’s lives look more accurately lame every year.
If you were take a slightly more highbrow straw poll–more wild assertions now–I’d bet that, of all the movies of 1999, our current across-the-board nobody-hates-it-and-most-people-love-it Best pick would be
. The reasons for this are sad, obvious, prosaic, and weirdly inspiring. Sad: The recent passing of Philip Seymour Hoffman. Obvious: Every single up-and-coming actor in the film’s main cast turned into one of the greatest and/or most overexposed actors of the ensuing decade. Prosaic: The movie is available on Netflix streaming, which is more than half the battle for a film’s cultural longevity now that nobody knows how to rent DVDs and most people are too cheap to pay for a single movie and too lazy to figure out how to watch movies illegally.
felt a bit old-fashioned in 1999, when it was a period-piece throwback thriller that didn’t have a chrono-blasting narrative and didn’t feature bullet-time digital effects and didn’t end with the revelation that one of the characters was actually a digital schizophrenic delusion ghost. 15 years later, that “old-fashioned” vibe just looks like genuine classicism: More refined filmmaking, reflective of whatever you think is lacking in movies today, good acting or sharp twists or unhappy endings or the notion of filming a major movie somewhere besides a greenscreen in Detroit.
Other movies from 1999 have aged well–maybe better than they deserve. The pre-millennial bumper crop of teen movies has led to a bumper crop in teen-movie nostalgia for
–a nostalgia that is barely justified by the fact that everyone seems to generally agree that
was the best of the bunch. Nobody really remembers most of
, but Al Pacino’s “Game of Inches” soliloquy is one of the great pump-up speeches, with a running time that’s just right for YouTube. (It might be the last great cheesy-transcendent moment in Hollywood sports movies, insofar as Hollywood basically stopped making sports movies.)
There’s a certain intersection of comedy freak and repressed nerd who will always stump for
. Anytime Reese Witherspoon makes a movie that’s even barely good, someone will always bring her absurdly brilliant performance in
. Anytime Samuel L. Jackson gives an inspiring speech in a movie,
gets approximately half-a-percent better. If you like romantic comedies–which is to say, if you miss when they made romantic comedies–then Julia Roberts’ summer of 1999 could be the golden age:
in August. And there are men of a certain age who can vividly recall that there was a movie called
, but they can’t remember the plot, the characters, the dialogue, or indeed anything at all besides two seconds from the trailer:
On the flip side: Some of the most important movies from 1999 have aged strange. Some have suffered minor backlash; some of them were so completely appropriated by the mainstream, their bold-new-newness becoming retroactively cliché; some were maybe never good to begin with. But what movie from 1999 has aged the
: There was a period when everyone agreed that
was going to be the action-fantasy saga of whatever generation we were, the
, a totally decent action movie ruined by a goofy dance number and the decision to climax with an old bearded man babbling towards the camera, and
, the first magnificently disappointing finale in a decade filled with magnificently disappointing finales. Over a decade later, most people have quietly agreed to ignore the sequels, but the original
is more of a solid action movie than a cultural obsession. Consider this: Fifteen years later, everyone seems weirdly okay with the fact that the
, the movie that invented the found-footage horror genre and simultaneously invented people complaining they were totally over the found-footage horror genre. You can’t say this without sounding like an old person, but: Back in 1999, when people still believed in truth, a not-inconsiderable amount of moviegoers were disappointed to learn that
was a fictional movie. Or anyhow, that was one of the narratives the media concocted to explain the wave of people disappointed by
. (Also possible: Lots of moviegoers were not necessarily prepared to watch a movie about people waving cameras at trees.) The fact that everyone could make a better-looking movie than
more fascinating as an artifact. But it sits weirdly in film history: Too popular to be a cult film, too low-key to be rewatchable. Also not helping matters: The flat-out awful follow-up 
. From a cultural-history perspective, the best thing about
: Some twists don’t age well. Some twists become everyone’s go-to example for what, precisely, a great twist is. But the gradual 2000s descent of M. Night Shyamalan makes any praise for
: Suburban ennui, the struggle of the middle-class straight white male, the moony-eyed teenager who films plastic bags because like beauty man, Thora Birch:
is like a veritable laundry list of Things That Seemed Important Until They Suddenly Didn’t. The reboot of Kevin Spacey as a
‘s stature, but this is one of those popular-at-the-time Best Picture winners that almost no one will admit to ever liking.
Star Wars: Episode One–The Phantom Menace
: Possibly aging better than you think, given that a generation of kids has grown up on the candy-colored digital effects pioneered by George Lucas and ILM in the prequels. Over a decade of geek loathing has also created a natural counter-backlash–the “It’s Not So Bad!” argument. Also helping matters: The Abrams-fronted sequel looks to be an aesthetic recreation of the original trilogy, all bright-orange pilot suits and janky-grit Millennium Falcons, which makes the rat-tails-and-priest-robes blandness of
look like a genuine aesthetic decision. It’s still terrible, but your niece or nephew born in a year that starts with a “2” might disagree.
is the “quality” picture and the best supporting evidence for anyone who wants to pretend they always thought Affleck was a good actor. (In my humble opinion,
is the best thing Smith’s ever done. Also in my opinion, the
DVD commentary is the best thing Affleck’s ever done.)
: Feels like it’s receded from the public consciousness, but only because
spent the next decade-plus being consistently good and frequently brilliant in an in-your-face topical way.
: Currently forgotten, but feels like it will become more important if/when ’90s nostalgia veers towards the latter, rave-ier part of the decade.
was one of the coolest movies ever made, and the film’s influence could be felt throughout the next decade. Big-budget movies copped 
claimed that Brad Pitt-as-Tyler Durden basically invented the modern action-hero body. But whole stretches of the movie sit weird now–it’s another vintage white-dude-problems movie, a less-funny
, complete with an incoherent ending that looks awesome and feels meaningless. Put it this way: How fondly you remember 
now probably depends on how many times over the last 15 years you heard a rich bro explain how 
What movies from 1999 have aged poorly? Which have aged well? Email me at darren_franich@ew.com, and we’ll chat further in Monday’s edition of the Entertainment Geekly mailbag.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Harry Potter Dark Arts Tour: London preview
Amanda Bynes checked into rehab: Reports
Stephen Collins\' talent agency cuts ties
Comic-book characters on TV: 6 jumping from panel to screen this season
\'Sons of Anarchy\': New on-set photos, cast reflections on a wild ride
Exodus: Gods and Kings" /> Exodus: Gods and Kings
This Week\'s Cover: EW takes a deep dive into the making of the electrifying drama \'Birdman,\' an Oscar-ready film that seems custom-made for star Michael Keaton.
Man of the Times: As Ichabod Crane on Fox\'s \'Sleepy Hollow,\' Tom Mison went from unknown actor to TV star in under a year. But as far as he\'s concerned, his career is just waking up.
Meghan Trainor\'s on a Roll: How a 20-year-old upstart conquered the pop charts—with a song she almost couldn\'t give away.
J.K. Rowling\'s cryptic tweet got fans buzzing
On the Books: Salman Rushdie shares PEN prize with Syrian activist
Haruki Murakami didn\'t win the Nobel -- but these books prove why he deserves it
On the Books: Works by a young Truman Capote released
French writer Patrick Modiano wins Nobel Prize in Literature
On the Books: 52 years of Bob Dylan lyrics to be compiled into book
A Brief History of Seven Killings A- Marlon James
\'Tomorrowland\' has a surprise for N.Y. Comic-Con: George Clooney
Casting Net: Joaquim de Almeida and Zoe Kazan join Sandra Bullock in \'Our Brand Is Crisis;\' more
\'Citizenfour\' trailer reveals interviews with Edward Snowden
Creepy Jake Gyllenhaal has a knack for news in \'Nightcrawler\'
Kate Beckinsale freaks out in this \'Stonehearst Asylum\' clip
Katy Perry eyed for Super Bowl halftime show
Jessica Lange sings David Bowie: Full version
Synth, psychedelia mix on Canopies\' \'The Plunderers and the Pillagers\'
Meghan Trainor talks \'All About That Bass,\' Beyonce, and Bieber
Melvin Van Peebles on his new album and the possibility of alien life
(What\'s the Story) Morning Glory? reissue A Oasis
Cheek to Cheek B+ Tony Bennett, Lady Gaga
\'How to Get Away With Murder\'; \'Scandal\'; \'Grey\'s Anatomy\' recaps
read more
save

0 comments