The Hunger Games Question
Should The mockingjay movie be in two parts, like the last Harry potter and twilight?
|
writer098 posted over a year ago
|
|
next question »
|
|
The Hunger Games Answers
|
flabaloobalah said:
it is actually.
catching fire: thanksgiving 2013
mockingjay part 1: thanksgiving 2014
mockingjay part 2: thanksgiving 2015
its been confirmed. what hasnt been confirmed, however, is where exactly they will be splitting them.
|
|
|
A-347 said:
It kinda annoys me that book-movies follow this trend but yes, it will be. It's been confirmed.
|
|
|
jaimiejo128 said:
i dont think they should but i they said that they would
|
|
|
Maddie07192000 said:
No, because breaking dawn and deathly hollows are longer than the other books and the story line changes a little bit in the middle, though the story line does change in hunger games, its just as long as all the other books.
|
|
|
MarlenaLovett said:
I'd prefer they didn't, but I know they are going to.
|
|
|
District14 said:
yes and it will be. If they did it for twilight and harry potter, 2 huge movies based on books, they have to with mockingjay.
|
|
|
MrsFinnick said:
yes. They kind of need to that otherwise the movie would be like, four hours long to fit in everything that was in the book.
|
|
|
Trading96 said:
BREAKING NEWS!!! THE DIRECTORS OF THE HUNGER GAMES MOVIES ARE CONSIDERING AND MOST LIKELY CHOOSING A TWO PART MOcKINGJAY MOVIE!!!
|
|
|
LuvPeeta12 said:
I think if any movie should be split into 2 parts it should be Catching fire because Catching Fire has soooo.....many details and great parts that if they miss anything they could disappoint people however it is usually the last movie that is cut into two parts so i honestly dont care that much but i would rather them split mocking jay then CF.
|
|
|
calypso134 said:
I think it should be because there would only be 3 movies but now there would be 4 movies that means more Peeta
|
|