|
TheUltimateBoss said:
I can't really answaer that, because let's say Qui-Gon Jinn got killed by Xanatos. Then he'd be replaced by someone else in the films. Same goes for everyone. Without Anakin, Luke, Shmi, Obi-Wan, Qui-Gonn, Yoda, Palpy, Leia, Han, Lando, Chewie, everyone would have a replacement.
Other than that, I'd say Anakin. Without him (no matter how sucky Christensen's acting was), we would have the Galaxy as we know it. As a replacement, Sidious might have turned someone else to his will. Someone less strong, someone not the chosen one. Without Anakin, we'd never have a succesful rebellion, because we wouldn't have Luke and Leia to keep the whole thing going. Bail Organa would have been killed, then we'd have Mon Mothma and Ackbar left. They'd be captured, and Ackbar would be executed and Mothma would be imprisoned.
Thus you can see a lot of side effects of no Anakin.
But then let's say we had no Qui-Gonn. Who'd bring Anakin to the Jedi? No one. Eventually he would grow up and join the Republican forces during the Clone Wars, then the Empire would take over, and Anakin would join the Rebellion. But he wouldn't meet Padme. No Luke or Leia? Goodbye Galaxy, hello Imperial Rule.
What if we had no Obi-Wan? No one to cripple Skywalker. Sidious would have an ultimately powerful apprentice, a Darth Vader who could even summon Force lightning! Then we'd have no one to bring Luke to the direction of the Force. Even if say Yoda found him, it'd be too late.
My best answers would be Anakin, Qui-Gonn, and Obi-Wan in that order.
|
|