answer this question

Random Question

How far would you go to prove a point?

How far would you go to prove a point?
 JetBlack_ posted over a year ago
next question »

Random Answers

BlindBandit92 said:
Whatever is necessary and whatever fits the current situation.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
wantadog said:
I've been known to go to excessives to prove myself right.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
zanhar1 said:
Extremely.
I'm almost dangerously stubborn.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
CokeTheUmbreon said:
Depends.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Mauserfan1910 said:
Usually to pubmed or some other reputable scientific journal

select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
TheLefteris24 said:
Honestly, if you asked me on the past, I would have said extremely since I used to be quite Stubborn. Well, I still am. Just not as much as I used to XD Now, it depends on the occasion. When it comes to proving something not only for my sake but for others as well or when a Subject I strongly feel about gets involved, I'll go as much as I can, providing anything necessary. If it's about most kinds of arguments which prove to be pointless in the end, I'll simply state my stance on the matter and reasons for it. If people still have an issue with that, I couldn't care less. I don't mind getting into more detail or explaining further for those who might not get what I have said at first but I won't spend time to amplify my statements to those who simply dismiss them. Leaving a conversation or not replying back doesn't mean accepting what another has told you. It is just pretty tiring to deal with a person who is hooked in disagreeing with you just for the sake of it which happens pretty often. Quite draining really. That being said, I can admit when I'm wrong and follow another's point if it's reasonable. Continuing the argument feels meaningless otherwise. A conversation is about everyone participating in it to have learnt something at the end of it and not about someone coming out on top. I find the realization of the first to be respectable in a person and the later to be a pretty stupid and an immature way of thinking. Cooperation is key. If you don't have that, there's no point in bothering !!!!
select as best answer
Honestly, if you asked me on the past, I would have said extremely since I used to be quite Stubborn. Well, I still am. Just not as much as I used to XD Now, it depends on the occasion. When it comes to proving something not only for my sake but for others as well or when a Subject I strongly feel about gets involved, I'll go as much as I can, providing anything necessary. If it's about most kinds of arguments which prove to be pointless in the end, I'll simply state my stance on the matter and reasons for it. If people still have an issue with that, I couldn't care less. I don't mind getting into more detail or explaining further for those who might not get what I have said at first but I won't spend time to amplify my statements to those who simply dismiss them. Leaving a conversation or not replying back doesn't mean accepting what another has told you. It is just pretty tiring to deal with a person who is hooked in disagreeing with you just for the sake of it which happens pretty often. Quite draining really. That being said, I can admit when I'm wrong and follow another's point if it's reasonable. Continuing the argument feels meaningless otherwise. A conversation is about everyone participating in it to have learnt something at the end of it and not about someone coming out on top. I find the realization of the first to be respectable in a person and the later to be a pretty stupid and an immature way of thinking. Cooperation is key. If you don't have that, there's no point in bothering !!!!
posted over a year ago 
next question »