 |
katana64 said:
Let me explain to you why this question is wrong.
In short: you are not to assume that if something exists, that therefore it has a creator. This question assumes its own conclusion, in something called circular logic, that if not this creator, then there must be a creator.
If you see an apple tree, pruned and picked, in an orchard, are you to assume it was placed deliberately? The extent of the maintenance and orderly construction suggests yes.
If you see an apple tree in the middle of a forest that is mangled and sick, are you to assume it has a creator? It's more likely to have come about by natural processes. Such as the consumption and defecation of an animal.
If you see self replicating proteins in a hot soup of other complex chemicals in the middle of a chaotic universe, are you to assume it has a creator, or that it came about by natural processes?
TL;DR, we created ourselves through the power of nature.
|
|
best answer
