Pokémon

answer this question

Pokémon Question

omg the names of the pokemon are obvious to wat they are dont you a agree

omg the names of the pokemon are obvious to wat they are dont you a agree
 froslass101 posted over a year ago
next question »

Pokémon Answers

TeamGalacticFan said:
It can depend something like Squirtle,Caterpie or Skitty can be very obvious.But then Pokemon like Rayquaza,Torterra and Zorua aren't as obvious so really it can depend.
 select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Agent-Cynda said:
What's your point?
 select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
excuse me i just now realised it thank you very much
froslass101 posted over a year ago
*
No, I'm not saying it's a bad thing, I just want to know: What's so bad about it? They still have clever names.
Agent-Cynda posted over a year ago
pumpkinqueen said:
I think it's cute and cool they sound like that. Like Trubbish "rubbish" it's clever and sounds adorable! X3
 select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
I agree with you it is adorable!
TeamGalacticFan posted over a year ago
*
But Trubbish, Garbodor, Woobat and Swoobat ugly pokemon.
Agent-Cynda posted over a year ago
Hiding 4 comments... click to show.
*
I think Swoobat's cute, just that, I'm not much of a fan of its prevo, Woobat. But really, Swoobat's cute.
miloticfan54 posted over a year ago
ninjacupcake88 said:
Some are, some aren't. I mean, if you take names like Furret, Skitty, Zubat, Grumpig, Ponyta or Combee then yeah, but if you take some like Darumanitan, Lapras, Natu, Milotic, Oddish, or Blitzle then no.
Some can be really cute with obvious names though :)
 select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Well, all this time, I'm still not sure on what Milotic's name was inspired from... I have some ideas but...
miloticfan54 posted over a year ago
nickm3 said:
Grammer no good
 select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »
Cookies help us bring you Fanpop. By using Fanpop, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More Got It!