Harry Potter 2010 For The Last Film Are You Kidding?

kim1891 posted on Jul 31, 2007 at 02:28PM
The octors are gonna be 20 year old playin 17 year old carnt they have it in 2009 pleaaaaaaaaasexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Harry Potter 10 replies

Click here to write a response...
over a year ago piperpayton22 said…
i knoe for real they should i know the 6th movie comes out nov 21 2008 so if is possible if they have it in 2009
over a year ago kyoosuke said…
Nah, I'm not worried, first of all, I'm betting on that the movies will not be as good as the books (at least existing 5 Potter movies have been kind of disappointment), secondly, I'm sure if they really want to, there will be makeup specialists helping them.
I just hope they will make the rest of movies longer than 2 hours. Seriously, I wouldn't mind sitting through a 4+ hour Potter movie.
last edited over a year ago
over a year ago piperpayton22 said…
i would love to see a four hour harry potter movie if it means everything in the book is in the movie
over a year ago kyoosuke said…
Let's all go to JKR's website and ask her to persuade next directors to make FULL harry potter movies!
over a year ago goalstopper said…
it doesn't really matter. the movies will be a disapointment even if it does include everything. because we all of the imagination of the book is something different.
over a year ago Phoenix315 said…
The movie has to come out 2010 or it will be too rushed. I dont think the actors will be too old they'll only be a few years older than their characters and most actors in shows that are about highschoolers are usually in their 20's. But i really wish that would make a movie that has everything in it, especially the 7th book, i dont care if its 8 hours, just as long as there's an intermission. lol
over a year ago tubby2002 said…
I have been expecting the movie to be out in 2010. If you think about it the 3rd was out jul 04, then the 4th was Nov 05 then the 5th was jul 07 and now the 6th is due Nov 08...it only follows that the 7th will be jul 10.

It wont be so bad the trio playing 17 when they are like 20...big deal, people do it all the time. And I read somewhere once that they guy who played young tom riddle in Chamber of Secrets was like 23 or something and his character was only 16...it isnt that bad.

I would rather them be a little older than the movies be rushed or new people play them...
last edited over a year ago
over a year ago kyoosuke said…
Re: Phoenix315
Ha, 8 hours of Harry Potter! Well, honestly, I wouldn't mind. I remember that movie 'War and Peace' was 8-hour long! and it was actually a good movie.
So, 8 hours of Potter, ya, I can take it.
over a year ago solsis said…
They won't be that much older...most actors that play teenagers are way older. There are many actors that play character far from their age so I don't think its going to be a problem.
Also I really don't think 'the movies are gonna be a dissapointment' like goalstopper said...I mean you havent seen them you dont know what they are gonna be like. Obviouslt they are not like the books but u cant expect them to be! Everyone works really hard in the harry potter movies and I think they do a really good job...its really difficult to make!
Also like many people said, I would mind wathicing a 4hour harry potter movie!
over a year ago snoznoodle said…
Yeah I agree with solsis, I reckon everyone in the movies have gotten so much better since the 1st movie. I think they'll do a good job now.

2010 isnt a surprise really since there is so much in the last to books. They're kind of crucial aren't they, they need to be worked on carefully.