I never questioned this. Her character wasn't lessened in any way by not having a boyfriend. Actually I respected her more because she didn't. There's more to life than having a boyfriend. Luna had interests and passions others didn't understand, she expressed them completely unshaded and she didn't compromise herself or her personality for a guy.
Exactly! Being in a couple doesn't necessarily equal happiness, and there's nothing wrong with being single! What happened to enjoying characters as CHARACTERS, and not always having to "ship" them with someone?
She's a minor character in YOUR opinion, but not necessarily in the opinion of other fans. Dumbledore and Severus are central to the story, without them, there's not even a story, so yes, they are main characters. But then, that's just my opinion. ;)
snape nad dumbledore? i mean the story for me is a little bit changed because it needs to be voldemort beacause hes the one who is interested about dumbledores wand and place
I would have loved to read about Luna in the "19yrs later"part as the other six(harry-ron-hermione-ginny-neville&malfoy)were mentioned. However,I like Luna single.With her unique beliefs and perceptions,SHE IS BETTER OFF WITHOUT ANY GUY!!!
posted over a year ago
Well, she does eventually marry Rolf Scamander, but she marries much later than the others.
